Compare
Tamanor vs. manual moderation
How a centralized, audited, rule-consistent firewall compares with checking each platform by hand. A workflow comparison — no numeric time-savings are claimed.
What changes
Manual moderation means opening each platform and reading comments by hand: coverage depends on who is watching and when, rules live in people's heads, and there is no single record of what was decided.
Tamanor centralizes monitored comments and reviews into one place, applies the same brand rules and AI risk detection to every item, and records every action in an append-only audit log — so decisions are consistent and reviewable rather than ad hoc.
Honest limits
Tamanor still keeps a human in the loop: it prepares proposals and a person approves them. It does not claim to eliminate review effort or to guarantee nothing is ever missed — it makes coverage systematic and auditable. No specific percentage of time saved is claimed, because that depends on your volume.
Frequently asked questions
- Does Tamanor replace human reviewers?
- No. It centralizes and prioritizes the work; a human still approves every action.
- Do you claim a specific time saving?
- No — any number would depend on your comment volume and team, so we do not publish one.