Compare

Tamanor vs. autonomous AI moderation

Tamanor is human-in-the-loop, not autonomous: AI detects and proposes, rules and capability gates apply, and a human approves before any action. Execution is fail-closed.

The real difference

A fully autonomous system decides and acts on its own. Tamanor deliberately does not: automatic execution is off. AI produces a risk assessment and a proposed action; brand rules, the approval workflow, platform-capability checks and connector-health gates all apply; and a human approves before anything touches a platform.

Execution is fail-closed — if a capability or permission is missing at execute time, the action fails safely and is audited rather than forced through. Tamanor is not, and is not presented as, a fully autonomous moderator.

Frequently asked questions

Can I enable fully automatic hiding?
No. Automatic execution is intentionally not available; proposals are prepared for human approval.
Is Tamanor an autonomous AI agent?
No. It is human-in-the-loop by design; autoExecution is off.
Human-in-the-loop vs. autonomous AI moderation